Coliving Vs Traditional Housing-Weighing the Pros and Cons
See In metro cities such as Delhi, the accommodation sector is evolving at a rapid pace. Coliving spaces are becoming popular, competing with traditional housing. There are several factors that have coliving spaces trending among professionals and students. Coliving vs traditional housing comparison reflects the advantages and disadvantages of both.
The weighing of pros and cons helps in making a better decision. The accommodation choice entails several factors such as budget, preference, location, needs and facilities.
Coliving spaces are making waves because of shared amenities, better facilities and community engagement.
Read below to learn more about differences between coliving spaces and traditional housing.
Coliving Vs Traditional Housing: How Coliving Spaces Are Transforming Traditional Accommodations for Better
Coliving spaces are the evolved and sophisticated version of traditional housing. The trend of shared spaces is gaining popularity due to better amenities and facilities.
Coliving Spaces Are Cost-Effective Option
Affordability is the most important factor of coliving spaces. The shared housing, common areas and amenities offer more resources at a lesser cost. The traditional housing has been focused on individual living and amenities are limited. Coliving spaces provide a holistic environment for residents, taking care of all aspects of living.
Accommodation is not just a place to stay and sleep, it’s a home away from family. A package deal includes facilities like meals, self service laundry, cleaning services and security. Coliving spaces are built and designed to offer a sense of belonging without draining the pockets. Compared to traditional housing, shared living spaces are a budget-friendly option.
Coliving Offers Sense of Community, Traditional Housing Focus on Privacy
Traditional housing such as PGs are built for individual living or shared rooms between mates. PGs often have very few options for shared spaces. Coliving spaces remedy this by providing a lounging area, workspace and place for group activities. Coliving vs traditional housing differs in the sense that the former is designed to facilitate interactions.
Adjusting in a new city or state can be a challenge. People can often feel lonely, coliving spaces offer a solution through social connections. Residents can interact with like minded people and form friendships. Coliving spaces like Uniliv also take care of residents’ privacy while maintaining a lively atmosphere.
Check our Related Article: How Working Professionals are Embracing PG Living
Coliving Vs Traditional Housing: Professional Management Vs Private Ownership
Traditional housing such as PGs are owned and managed by house/ building owners. In PGs, direct communication with the owner may prove beneficial in some cases. Coliving spaces are operated under the professional management of the owner company. There is a support system for answering the needs of residents.
There is dedicated staff for each task in coliving buildings. Traditional housing has fewer staff and fewer amenities. The facilities and amenities provided by traditional housing fades greatly in comparison to coliving spaces. The package deals seem more beneficial for coliving spaces than traditional accommodations.
Coliving Spaces Have Shared Amenities and Better Facilities
See Coliving and traditional housing offers a variety of options to choose from. Coliving spaces offer shared amenities and better facilities at affordable prices. The shared spaces and amenities help in bringing the cost down. It also aids in experiencing an interactive and lively atmosphere. Such spaces offer professional services for cleaning and maintenance.
Traditional housing is way less focused on building a sense of belonging. The shared spaces such as workspaces, dining rooms or relaxation areas are often not available in traditional housing. Coliving spaces focus on ready-to-live convenience. They are evolving the accommodation sector with better quality of housing.
Security and Safety: Coliving Spaces Have Systematic Measures
All accommodations should provide security and safety to the residents. The security management differs from traditional accommodation to new evolving spaces. Traditional housing relies on owners to provide security guards and to monitor CCTV cameras. Coliving spaces hire professionals to implement security measures.
Safety is the first priority while looking for accommodation. Coliving spaces often have fingerprint locks to safeguard residents. Traditional housings are adapting digital measures too, but at a slower pace. The sense of community adds to the security factor at coliving spaces.
Conclusion
Accommodation is more than just a place to stay. Modern forms of housing are understanding the need for holistic care in living away from home. Compared to traditional housing, coliving spaces are designed to offer a certain lifestyle. The shared spaces, professional management and community relations promises better facilities.
Coliving vs traditional housing is an emerging debate in the accommodation sector. It promotes healthy competition and provides more options for housing. The choice between two is an individual decision that should be made after due research and consideration.
Weigh your options carefully to choose the best form of accommodation, a home away from home.